Deep analyzes/discussions about bums

[Sybb]

Most of the threads here are only about one thing, posting lots of images. There's little to no actual discussion. So I want to know if there are other people here who loves to actually analyze the bum, rather than just finding it "hot or not"? People sadly tend to be either not interested, or accuse you of autism XD because you want more than just shallow opinions.

For example:


How would you describe the differences between these two bums? And not just "one is nice, the other one is nasty". Deeper and more analytical. How is the size compared to the girls' bodies? How can you tell if they're firm or not?

In order to do this, effort is needed. Is there any effort here?

 

[x20]

The one to the left, Claire Danes butt is fat (in a good way) the other bum is more athletic
While both butts have their charms and are sexy, I think I like Claire Danes' butt the best

 

[Sybb]

The one to the left, Claire Danes butt is fat (in a good way) the other bum is more athletic
While both butts have their charms and are sexy, I think I like Claire Danes' butt the best

Good start! Let's go deeper and do more thinking.

Why do you think Claire's butt looks fat? And how can you tell Laura's butt is firmer?

 

[oopsboops]

Which Laura is this? Also, I assume the greater distinction between cheek and thigh has to do with why Claire Danes’ looks less toned (and therefore fatter and/or older), and Laura’s looks more athletic - obviously in some cases it’s muscle tone and definition that make the cheek and thigh look more separate, but in this case, I guess it’s less resistance to gravity making a more distinct crease on Claire?

And, although Claire’s bikini bottom gives her an advantage in my eyes (I’m guessing most people on this forum would prefer Laura’s?) and that makes this photo a somewhat uneven playing field for me, I think I still prefer Laura’s ass based on this one photo.

Also, I’ve noticed that people in this forum seem interested in other people’s opinions and input in different ways than I am (and almost exclusively in the shallower way Sybb mentioned). No judgment of either, but this thread (obviously, based on the length of my reply) piqued my interest in a different (I think - idk) but similarly “autistic” way.

 

[UncleBob1954]

Non-althetic, no muscle tone in their glutes , hammies , arms, shoulders, backs.